Skip to main content

Does Religion Simply Sugar Coat Every Evil?

The ability of people to deny that their religion has ever done a single thing wrong throughout history, attributing all such "errors" instead to the devil and fallible human nature, is a miracle of deception that only a god could pull off. And since such people are sure that God is incapable of ever engaging in any evil whatsoever, and deception was the very evil that cursed Adam & Eve as much as it crucified Christ, so grand a deception as this could only have been pulled off by devil himself.  

It is this very fact that leaves us to wonder if religion is itself not simply a means by which we sugar coat every evil in the sacred robes on one religion or another, allowing us always to find a way of living with whatever sins we feel we had to commit, to secure our salvation, and in service to our God. 

  On the one hand, "it is impossible for a human being to willingly do wrong," argued Socrates, “because our instinct for self-interest prevented us from doing so.” On the other hand, "people never commit evil so fully and so joyfully," as Blaise Pascal pointed out, " as when they do it for religious convictions." 

But if "religion" is about preventing people from doing wrong, in addition to many other things of course, why is it that people "never commit evil so fully and joyfully" as when they are doing it for their sacred religions? 

Is there something about religion in particular that turns people from perfectly sane Church going folk, into pure psychopaths for their own salvation? Is religion simply an inebriating elixir that miraculously turns souls as pure as water into ones as red as wine?  Does religion alone have the god-like power, in other words, to transform any act of evil into a supreme act of virtue by simply recasting our terror of the eternal fires of hell into a "love" for the very deity who not only created such a place, but likewise threatens to hurl us headlong into it?

Or to put it another way, is our wholly "self-interested" pursuit of eternal salvation the very thing that allows us to recast as a sacred virtue our willingness to murder the whole world in order to obtain it?  

The irony of religion, then, is that there has probably never been a single act of evil committed collectively by humanity that was not seen by the vast majority of those who participated in it as not only having some unquestionable moral and even Biblical foundation, but as also being something, however tragic it may have been in fact, as always being an act of faith that necessarily served some much greater "good" or God or "divine plan."

It is not as if the millions of people who supported slavery and Christian imperialism of hearts as much as souls, who marched off by the millions to fight war after war after war, or those who committed genocide from Native Americans to Armenians to Jews to Cambodians and Tutsi's, had all suddenly  overnight thrown off any and all of the moral constraint that an entire life of Christian conditioning had been relied upon to keep in place. And even if they had, what then does that tell us about the efficacy of such Christian conditioning, that it can so easily be discarded

Yet this is exactly what every priest or pastor, parent or politician, would have their children, congregations, and constituents believe, and exactly what they all willing choose to believe across the globe

And they believe this,  whenever they accept the idea that only religion and a belief in God can keep us moral and from tearing out each other's throats, while rejecting the fact that most if not all of those who willingly engaged in such bloodshed and horror, did so only after they had convinced themselves that no matter how unbeknownst to them the reasons and the causes of the conflagrations they haplessly found themselves thrown into, or how evil the ultimate aims may have been of those special few who had forced them to participate in it all, their own soul was insulated from any responsibility for any of it, because they knew in their own hearts and minds that they were ultimately only doing what they did out of sincere Christian service to, and a deep and abiding love and trust in, their Jesus and their God.










Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why Ben Shapiro is Wrong About BLM

If Ben Shapiro really wants answers to his condemnations of BLM, he should start by reading a few books, and then some. For example, he can find all of the answer's he's looking for in: Slavery By Another Name , by Douglas Blackmon, which shows how "thousands of African Americans were pulled back into forced labor with shocking force and brutality," right up until the 1970s, when I was still in grade school. The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness , by Civil Rights litigator and legal scholar, Michelle Alexander, which explains how "mass incarceration" under the ruse of a War on Drugs, has effectively created a caste system that is as pronounced in America today as it was in the Jim Crow south, if not more. Ghosts of Jim Crow , which was written by Constitutional Law Professor, F. Michael Higgenbotham, which explains in great detail how "the shadows of Jim Crow era laws and attitudes continue to perpetuate insidious, ...

Father Mike's Omniscience About Transgenderism

The major problems in the world are the result of the difference between how nature works and how people think. Gregory Batson I f my perception doesn't match up with reality, it's not reality that has to change, it's my perception.   Fr. Mi ke Schmitz Despite the ever growing mountain of evidence about the nature of transgenderism, Fr. Mike Schmitz simply refuses to change his perception. And that's because his "perception," is not only based on nothing but his "beliefs," but because selling those "beliefs" is his one and only job! The problem, if he were truly trying to follow in the footsteps of Christ, is he would stop trying to sell people what he "believes" is the truth, and he would try to actually start trying to FIND THE TRUTH instead.  NOT DOING SO, however, is simply an act of his own spiritual pride, and nothing else. WHY DO CHRISTIANS PREFER THEIR BELIEFS TO THE TRUTH?  Probably because th...

The Height of Arrogance of Christian Humility

 "To think that the ruler of the universe will run to my assistance and bend the laws of nature for me is the height of arrogance. That implies that everyone else (such as the opposing football team, driver, student, parent) is de -selected, unfavored by God, and that I am special, above it all." Dan Barker, Losing Faith in Faith: From Preacher to Atheist (Madison, WI: FFRF, 1992), p. 109. What could be more arrogant than to believe in miracles? To believe that the supreme ruler of the universe has not only bent the laws of nature by which everyone else is bound, but that such a ruler did so as a special favor to you, and also as a special message and invitation to you, which that ruler intentionally withholds from everyone else.  Even the person who believes they know something is a miracle believes that their knowledge of miracles is itself a special knowledge, amounting to a kind of miracle in and of itself, that the God who performed the miracle bestows to his chosen ...