Skip to main content

Why The Christian God is an Automaton

The Christian will assure you that God can do no evil, even though God murdered everyone on the planet at one point, repeatedly told his "chosen people" to commit numerous acts of genocide in the Old Testament, murdered the sons of the Egyptians during Passover with as much indifference as Herod massacred the innocent children of Bethlehem in his attempt to kill Jesus, sent numerous plagues and famines to torture his "children" that he had arbitrarily decided weren't his "chosen" children, allowed his "only begotten son" to be tortured and killed rather than simply forgiving humanity the same way he "commands" them to, and all of this is done to compensate for his own insecurity and in the name of his own vanity. 

But, of course, any christian will deny this, as easily as anyone one of Charles Manson's family members would assure you that "Charlie" is simply misunderstood. In this respect, it is certainly not a coincidence that the followers of "Christ" also call themselves "a family." 

But putting all of this aside, as any Christian obediently does, we are still left with a God who is utterly undeserving of any praise at all, if the Christian is right. Why? 

Because if God can "do no wrong," than he is like a washing machine that can do nothing but wash. We would not praise a robot that can "do no wrong," even though we may congratulate the maker of the robot. 

But if God is simply a robot that is incapable of doing anything wrong, as the Christian who denies everything at the top of this page surely insists (the christian simply blames the victims for all of their suffering), then why should we praise him for his "goodness" when "goodness" is all he can do? Again, this is like praising a computer that never malfunctions, or your car for never breaking down. 

Of course, the Christian is quite sure to disagree with this, pointing out that God can do anything, except evil.

So why should a God who can do anything but evil be praised? 

The Christian thinks it is because God loves us, even though any parent who loves their children would surely do anything in their power to prevent any evil from befalling that child; unless that parent is God, of course, who can not only do no evil, but apparently can do nothing to stop evil either, lest he run the risk of running that minor infraction of denying free will. 

Yes, "free will" is so important to God, in fact, that He is willing to allow any evil whatsoever to prove it. God, in other words, thinks it would be a far, far, greater "evil" for Him to impede in the slightest way on someones "free will," even of that of a Hitler or a Stalin, than any amount of evil that could ever be performed by the likes of Hitler, Stalin, or every serial killer who ever lived.  What a pal!

Yeah..what a "great plan" for a God who can do anything. Yes.. pray away, Christians, He'll most likely kill you in the morning anyway.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why Christianity is More Unnatural Than Homosexuality

I grew up in a family that is about as homophobic as Phil Robertson and the Westboro Baptists, only they're not quite as boisterous about it; at least not in public anyway. They have also conveniently convinced themselves  that their homophobia is really just their unique Christian ability to "hate the sin, but love the sinner" (even though these very same Christians adamantly refuse to accept that people can "hate Christianity, but love the Christian").  The sexual superiority complex necessarily relied on by such Christians is, of course, blanketed beneath the lambs wool of the Christian humility of serving "God." They interpret their fear of those who are different, in other words, as simply proof of their intimate knowledge and love of God. And the only thing such Christians are more sure about than that their own personal version of "God" exists, is that such a "God" would never want people to be homosexual - no matter how ma

Christianity: An Addiction of Violence Masquerading as Love: Part II

"But God by nature must love Himself supremely, above all else." Fr. Emmet Carter   This is part  two of a look at an article written about the "restorative and medicinal" properties of punishment, as espoused by Fr. Emmett Carter (https://catholicexchange.com/gods-punishment-is-just-restorative-and-medicinal/).  Ideas of this sort in Christianity go back to St. Augustine and Thomas Aquinas - two saints who saw the suffering of Christ as sure fire evidence that God needed humans to suffer to balance the cosmic scales of his love for us. Sure, he could've come up with a better game, or made better humans, but its apparently the suffering he really enjoys seeing. Carter's essay raises countless questions, especially about the true nature of God's blood lust, but lets stick to just four simpler ones. The first question deals with the idea of "free will." According to Christians, God designed us with the ability to freely choose to obey or offend h

Christianity: An Addiction of Violence Masquerading as Love: Part I

If the Holy Bible proves anything at all, it proves that the Christian God has a blood-lust like no other God in history. From Abraham to Jesus to the end times to eternal hell, the Christian God loves suffering even more than, or at least as much as, said God loves Himself. And if everything from the genocides in the Old Testament and God killing everyone on the planet with a flood, to Jesus being tortured and murdered (rather than the devil, who is the guilty one) and the fiery end of the world followed by the never ending fires of hell, are not enough to convince you that Christianity is really an addiction to violence masquerading as "love," just consider the psychotic rantings of a Catholic priest trying to convince his faithful flock that murder and mutilation - which he calls "punishment" -  are proof of just how much his "God" is pure love.  In an article published on https://catholicexchange.com/gods-punishment-is-just-restorative-and-medicinal/,