Skip to main content

Taking a Knee: Saluting the American Soldier


Not too long ago, Colin Kaepernick took a knee to protest police brutality agaisnt African Americans. He made this protest, which was an act in a larger movement called Black Lives Matter, because too often in America, Black Lives are treated as if they matter much less than white lives. And nothing demonstrates this better than America's bogus War on Drugs. But while his protest has been described as being disrespectful of American soldiers who died fighting to defend his freedom, in truth, it should properly be understood to be the very opposite of that. 

Kaepernick's justifiable protest about America's systemic racism that clearly illustrates just how much Black Lives matter less than white lives (which is why white people would never agree to trade places with black people in America), has been hijacked and re-framed as a slap in the face of soldiers who died fighting for freedom and justice in America's wars abroad. But by reframing Kaepernick's protest as an insult agaisnt dead American GIs, those who attack Kaepernick insult all those who died in the fight agaisnt racism, and for civil rights.

Kaepernick's detractors re-framed his protest of the national anthem as not only a slight toward dead American GIs who fought for his freedoms, but as a direct denigration of the very freedoms that allowed him to make such a protest in the first place, while collecting a paycheck of 19 million dollars a year just to play football.

The same people who claim to be the most upset with Kaepernick's protest, claim not to be upset about what he is protesting about (which they are less uncomfortable with, apparently), but about how he chose to protest (and this from many arch Conservatives who regularly accuse Liberals of being dominated by their emotions, ironically enough). They argue he has every "right" to protest the things he is unhappy about, of course, but that he should not protest the American flag by taking a knee during the playing of the national anthem.

Despite the fact that plenty of football fans, and countless other sports fans around the country, regularly fail to stand for the flag during the playing of the national anthem,  it is Kaep's deliberate protest, they argue, that directly disrespects all those who died defending our flag, and preserving his freedom. That Kaep's detractors are directly disrespecting all those who are forced to suffer under the brutal inequalities that such systemic racism produce, is either overlooked, or is just considered less important.

It is irrelevant to such detractors, in other words, that Kaep's protest agaisnt police brutality and systemic racism in America, is simply a continuation of the very same fight that so many American GIs died fighting agaisnt in Europe. Both forms of racism, after all, were not only exercised through laws, but were equally defended in the name of patriotism.

The problem is that simply "believing" that America is free and equal, does not mean that America is either one, especially for large numbers of minorities who are disproportionately treated like their lives matter a whole lot less than the Brock Turners of the world.         


Indeed, a country is not free simply because it claims to send soldiers off to die for "freedom" on foreign soil.  It is free because people have the courage to stand up to oppression and injustice, both on battlefields abroad and on buses here at home. And all those who demand respect for the soldiers who were killed on the former, only disrespect all those who were murdered trying to desegregate the latter, even though all of them died fighting for the exact same thing.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why Christianity is More Unnatural Than Homosexuality

I grew up in a family that is about as homophobic as Phil Robertson and the Westboro Baptists, only they're not quite as boisterous about it; at least not in public anyway. They have also conveniently convinced themselves  that their homophobia is really just their unique Christian ability to "hate the sin, but love the sinner" (even though these very same Christians adamantly refuse to accept that people can "hate Christianity, but love the Christian").  The sexual superiority complex necessarily relied on by such Christians is, of course, blanketed beneath the lambs wool of the Christian humility of serving "God." They interpret their fear of those who are different, in other words, as simply proof of their intimate knowledge and love of God. And the only thing such Christians are more sure about than that their own personal version of "God" exists, is that such a "God" would never want people to be homosexual - no matter how ma

Christianity: An Addiction of Violence Masquerading as Love: Part II

"But God by nature must love Himself supremely, above all else." Fr. Emmet Carter   This is part  two of a look at an article written about the "restorative and medicinal" properties of punishment, as espoused by Fr. Emmett Carter (https://catholicexchange.com/gods-punishment-is-just-restorative-and-medicinal/).  Ideas of this sort in Christianity go back to St. Augustine and Thomas Aquinas - two saints who saw the suffering of Christ as sure fire evidence that God needed humans to suffer to balance the cosmic scales of his love for us. Sure, he could've come up with a better game, or made better humans, but its apparently the suffering he really enjoys seeing. Carter's essay raises countless questions, especially about the true nature of God's blood lust, but lets stick to just four simpler ones. The first question deals with the idea of "free will." According to Christians, God designed us with the ability to freely choose to obey or offend h

Christianity: An Addiction of Violence Masquerading as Love: Part I

If the Holy Bible proves anything at all, it proves that the Christian God has a blood-lust like no other God in history. From Abraham to Jesus to the end times to eternal hell, the Christian God loves suffering even more than, or at least as much as, said God loves Himself. And if everything from the genocides in the Old Testament and God killing everyone on the planet with a flood, to Jesus being tortured and murdered (rather than the devil, who is the guilty one) and the fiery end of the world followed by the never ending fires of hell, are not enough to convince you that Christianity is really an addiction to violence masquerading as "love," just consider the psychotic rantings of a Catholic priest trying to convince his faithful flock that murder and mutilation - which he calls "punishment" -  are proof of just how much his "God" is pure love.  In an article published on https://catholicexchange.com/gods-punishment-is-just-restorative-and-medicinal/,