Skip to main content

The Terrorism of Religion: By Their Fruit Ye Shall Know Them

It has been said that the war on terrorism can never be won, because "terrorism" is simply an idea, and an "idea" can never be defeated. One reason for this, for example, is that "war" is "terrorism." Hence the "war on terrorism" is simply a redundancy. But religion is also just an "idea," that uses weapons like "hell" and god's wrath, and judgement day, to intimidate people into "believing" in a particular religion or god, even if there is little or no evidence to support the claim that such "beliefs" make people behave more morally toward each other -  and plenty of evidence to show the very opposite is true.

Christians and Muslims, of course, simply deny that the "evidence" of the great many sins of their religions should ever be considered to be the fault of their religions. For them, those sins are always the fault of the 'evil' their religions are designed to combat. These believers are convinced, in other words, that the "fruits" of their religions are only ever the virtues practiced by faithful, humble, seekers of truth and justice, and never the result of an absolute devotion to an idea. That some religious "extremists" seek to save people spiritually by executing them physically, they argue, should not be considered to be the fault of religion, but proof of the claims of religion that people are flawed and need to repent.

What the distinction just described boils down to is this: Religious devotees have a very different way of thinking about, and thus applying the phrase "by their fruits ye shall know them."

Non believers see this phrase as proof that religion is a lie, for they see crusades, terrorism, witch burnings, genocides, inquisitions, child rape,  and other such horrible acts, as being the "fruit" that let's us know what kind of bloody "tree" religion really is. Religion was not only the "tree" from which Adam and Eve ate forbidden fruit, according to some Christian interpretations of the story of Genesis, but also the "tree" (i.e. cross) upon which that 'enlightened' fellow Jesus was crucified for daring to challenge the dogmas (i.e. evils) of his own religion.

Hence, for non-believers, the sins committed in the name of religion is what determines what kind of "tree" religion really is, regardless of how it may help people cope with suffering or the depressing thought of their own unavoidable death.

For "true believers," on the other hand, this phrase is understood in a very different way. For them, the "strange fruit" of religion (to use the title of Billie Holiday's song about the lynchings of black men in America) lets us know who is actually practicing religion, and who is only claiming to practice that religion in order to commit evil. For the believer, in other words, this "fruit" informs us of the difference between true disciples of God (and therefore love and justice), and "false prophets," who are simply claiming to be disciples of God and their religion, in order to practice death and destruction for their own gain.

While the former thinks they have the correct understanding of their beliefs, the latter is believed to have it all wrong, and probably because we are all such flawed, imperfect beings, or because the devil has twisted their understanding. Believers, however, have been lucky enough to rise above such imperfections in their own interpretation of their religious beliefs,  "thanks be to god." And that's because God has shown them the "true" meaning of their religion, and thus this phrase. Why their "god" did not show this true meaning to others who are committing atrocities in the name of that same religion, is simply a a mystery, and proof that "god works in mysterious ways."

All of this - the good, the bad, and the evil -  is just "part of gods plan."It apparently never occurs to such "true believers," however, that humanity is in desperate need of a better plan. 



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why Christianity is More Unnatural Than Homosexuality

I grew up in a family that is about as homophobic as Phil Robertson and the Westboro Baptists, only they're not quite as boisterous about it; at least not in public anyway. They have also conveniently convinced themselves  that their homophobia is really just their unique Christian ability to "hate the sin, but love the sinner" (even though these very same Christians adamantly refuse to accept that people can "hate Christianity, but love the Christian").  The sexual superiority complex necessarily relied on by such Christians is, of course, blanketed beneath the lambs wool of the Christian humility of serving "God." They interpret their fear of those who are different, in other words, as simply proof of their intimate knowledge and love of God. And the only thing such Christians are more sure about than that their own personal version of "God" exists, is that such a "God" would never want people to be homosexual - no matter how ma

Christianity: An Addiction of Violence Masquerading as Love: Part II

"But God by nature must love Himself supremely, above all else." Fr. Emmet Carter   This is part  two of a look at an article written about the "restorative and medicinal" properties of punishment, as espoused by Fr. Emmett Carter (https://catholicexchange.com/gods-punishment-is-just-restorative-and-medicinal/).  Ideas of this sort in Christianity go back to St. Augustine and Thomas Aquinas - two saints who saw the suffering of Christ as sure fire evidence that God needed humans to suffer to balance the cosmic scales of his love for us. Sure, he could've come up with a better game, or made better humans, but its apparently the suffering he really enjoys seeing. Carter's essay raises countless questions, especially about the true nature of God's blood lust, but lets stick to just four simpler ones. The first question deals with the idea of "free will." According to Christians, God designed us with the ability to freely choose to obey or offend h

Christianity: An Addiction of Violence Masquerading as Love: Part I

If the Holy Bible proves anything at all, it proves that the Christian God has a blood-lust like no other God in history. From Abraham to Jesus to the end times to eternal hell, the Christian God loves suffering even more than, or at least as much as, said God loves Himself. And if everything from the genocides in the Old Testament and God killing everyone on the planet with a flood, to Jesus being tortured and murdered (rather than the devil, who is the guilty one) and the fiery end of the world followed by the never ending fires of hell, are not enough to convince you that Christianity is really an addiction to violence masquerading as "love," just consider the psychotic rantings of a Catholic priest trying to convince his faithful flock that murder and mutilation - which he calls "punishment" -  are proof of just how much his "God" is pure love.  In an article published on https://catholicexchange.com/gods-punishment-is-just-restorative-and-medicinal/,