Skip to main content

Transgenderism: Fr. Mike and The Omniscience Fallacy


When the only tool you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail.
 Abraham Maslow




Beliefs are the tail that wags the dog of truth. Like a colored lens, what we see is not how things are, but how we are, and how our own "beliefs" color them to be. And over this subjective difference of opinion about what is "true," people demand that God is always and everywhere on THEIR side. And because he always is, they all chase salvation by gleefully feeding themselves or others to the lions, out of their obstinate denial of reality, and they defend their "beliefs" (which only ever reinforce their fears) with all of the pride of Lucifer castigating God himself.

Fr. Mike Schmitz offered the Catholic Church's unabashed denial of reality recently on the Ascension Press Facebook page, by concluding that every problem must be a spiritual one, since  the only tool he has is his religion.

Since his "faith in Christ" had given him the omniscience of God in understanding anyone and everyone who has ever (or ever will) define themselves as "transgendered," Fr. Mike concluded that "transgenderism" amounted to nothing more than people suffering from emotional problems. (To be clear, Fr. Mike speaks for a Church that includes billions of people, that is arguing that "transgendered people" are simply confused about their gender because they have emotional problems. He also appears to think that NONE of those "emotional problems" could ever be the result of his own religion claiming that God had proclaimed, though his One True Church, that all of these people are "broken" and confused about their "gender, not because of genetics, but because of their deep emotional problems, and NOTHING ELSE! WTF is this guy smoking exactly?! This is like arguing that all slaves who run away from their masters must be suffering from the mental disease called "drapedomania," as Samuel Cartwright argued in 1851, because the bible supported slavery.)

Preferring the mustard seed of his own beliefs to the mountains of physical evidence to the contrary, Fr. Mike spoke with all of the omniscience of God (apparently) in determining that the only splinter that needed to be removed from anyone's vision about transgenderism sat squarely in the eye of those who define themselves as transgendered. Miraculously, however, he managed to completely ignore the battleship size plank in his own.  And since "catholic" means universal, his claims amount to the Church declaring once and for all what humanity, and human "gender" more specifically, are for everyone, everywhere, for forever and ever - amen!

Such "infallible" declarations that presume to know everything that could ever be known about gender to form such an opinion in the first place, and from nothing but reading and indeed obsessing about a Christian Bible no less, is what we could call the omniscience fallacy, which is the presumption that one religion or person can necessarily know either the infinite mind of God infallibly, or to know all of humanity throughout history, in all of it's near infinite varieties, and to have discerned what it all means infallibly.    

That Fr. Mike denies that his "Catholic beliefs" are warping his interpretation of reality to a level that he can simply assume his perspective is one based on such "omniscience, is made all the more ironic by the fact that he claims it is those who identify as "transgendered" who are the ones suffering from a warped sense of reality. Even though it is his own Catholicism that claims we are ALL suffering from such a "warped sense of reality," thanks to the fact we are all born infected with original sin,  Fr. Mike wants the world to "believe" that his own "beliefs"  in God have apparently allowed him to see objective reality for what God has always intended it to be - a binary prison of gender conformity.

The trouble is that, if we accept Fr. Mike's religion as legitimate, than we are left to wonder why he fails to notice how his Church's claim that it alone has the divine knowledge necessary to discern "objective reality" with all of the infallibility of God, in addition to being able to know exactly what it all means "objectively" speaking, why.. why does this all sound so much like the promise made by the serpent in the Garden of Eden to Adam and Eve?

As the serpent is said to have promised, if Eve would eat from the Tree of (presumably "divine") Knowledge, they would "be like God, knowing right from wrong" (as if anyone but Jesus or Lucifer would dare to suggest they know all of history, and all of humanity, and know unmistakably what it all means, and how and why we must be one way or another, and with complete infallible certainty). But by far the greatest miracle of such claims is that Christians insist they make them all in the name of nothing but pure "humility". (I think they spelled "hypocrisy" wrong.)

And given the fact that biologists have concluded humanity may have all originated from hermaphrodites, it is quite possible that the "lie" the serpent intended to dupe us with was getting us to think we were not already like God to begin with! After all, if Eve was made from Adam's rib, then they both shared either the XX or XY chromosomal pairs. Further more, if we have all descended from these hermaphroditic parents, who then only had THREE SONS (let that sink in for a minute, by the way) than how are we not ALL TRANSGENDERED?

 What's more, if there is only "One God" then "He" would necessarily need to be both genders simultaneously as well (because to declare God to be a "He" only implies the existence of a "She" god), then the "lie" was that we were not already "like God" we He made us all hermaphrodites to begin with!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why Ben Shapiro is Wrong About BLM

If Ben Shapiro really wants answers to his condemnations of BLM, he should start by reading a few books, and then some. For example, he can find all of the answer's he's looking for in: Slavery By Another Name , by Douglas Blackmon, which shows how "thousands of African Americans were pulled back into forced labor with shocking force and brutality," right up until the 1970s, when I was still in grade school. The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness , by Civil Rights litigator and legal scholar, Michelle Alexander, which explains how "mass incarceration" under the ruse of a War on Drugs, has effectively created a caste system that is as pronounced in America today as it was in the Jim Crow south, if not more. Ghosts of Jim Crow , which was written by Constitutional Law Professor, F. Michael Higgenbotham, which explains in great detail how "the shadows of Jim Crow era laws and attitudes continue to perpetuate insidious, ...

Father Mike's Omniscience About Transgenderism

The major problems in the world are the result of the difference between how nature works and how people think. Gregory Batson I f my perception doesn't match up with reality, it's not reality that has to change, it's my perception.   Fr. Mi ke Schmitz Despite the ever growing mountain of evidence about the nature of transgenderism, Fr. Mike Schmitz simply refuses to change his perception. And that's because his "perception," is not only based on nothing but his "beliefs," but because selling those "beliefs" is his one and only job! The problem, if he were truly trying to follow in the footsteps of Christ, is he would stop trying to sell people what he "believes" is the truth, and he would try to actually start trying to FIND THE TRUTH instead.  NOT DOING SO, however, is simply an act of his own spiritual pride, and nothing else. WHY DO CHRISTIANS PREFER THEIR BELIEFS TO THE TRUTH?  Probably because th...

The Height of Arrogance of Christian Humility

 "To think that the ruler of the universe will run to my assistance and bend the laws of nature for me is the height of arrogance. That implies that everyone else (such as the opposing football team, driver, student, parent) is de -selected, unfavored by God, and that I am special, above it all." Dan Barker, Losing Faith in Faith: From Preacher to Atheist (Madison, WI: FFRF, 1992), p. 109. What could be more arrogant than to believe in miracles? To believe that the supreme ruler of the universe has not only bent the laws of nature by which everyone else is bound, but that such a ruler did so as a special favor to you, and also as a special message and invitation to you, which that ruler intentionally withholds from everyone else.  Even the person who believes they know something is a miracle believes that their knowledge of miracles is itself a special knowledge, amounting to a kind of miracle in and of itself, that the God who performed the miracle bestows to his chosen ...