Skip to main content

We Do Not Hallucinate in Hindu

My brother once found a young boy who had hung himself in the basement of a neighbors house. For him, the experience was incredibly traumatic, as anyone can imagine it would be. The boy was around 10 or 12 years old, and his parents had recently undergone a very ugly divorce. As a result, the doctors had put him on drugs for depression which ultimately contributed to his death, in my opinion.

But my brother is a Catholic, which means the entire experience was interpreted within a Catholic paradigm of beliefs. Hence the boy had killed himself, not because of the drugs he'd been prescribed or the divorce of his parents, but because evil demonic forces had clearly been at work to lure the boy to his own demise.

Of course, had an atheist or a Shinto or a Buddhist found the boy, their own interpretation of the event,  however traumatized they might have been by the experience, would have been interpreted within a very different paradigm from the one my Catholic brother used. And it is this very tendency to think in terms of the beliefs and ideas that we are submersed in that demonstrates how our "beliefs" are not necessarily real.

Instead, all of our ideas are simply the reassembling of the very ideas were are the most familiar with, like Lego pieces. This is why a Catholic does not hallucinate in Hindu, why a Christian friar does not dream of meeting Vishnu, or what a Buddhist does not dream of Mohammad or Moses or Elijah.

Our "beliefs" and our knowledge in general, obviously become the furniture of our mind. That's why we only ever think, dream, or experience life (even via near death experiences - a NDE) within the context of our knowledge and beliefs.

That we are the product of our cultures and our environments, that our minds are simply the reflection of the religions commonly practiced in the countries we are born, and that our ideas about economics and politics are likewise based purely on our experiences and nothing more, is a fact.

There is nothing in the Bible, nor has there ever been a single claim by anyone, that God claimed that capitalism is the most moral and efficient way to run an economy, or that "democracy" (which American is NOT) is necessarily the "best" form of political government.

But the fact that so many people actually believe that God would argue that capitalism and democracy are somehow as divinely revealed as Christianity (even though both capitalism and democracy are the complete opposite of Christianity), shows not only that all of our "beliefs" are simply the result of social conditioning, but that even completely opposing beliefs such as these can be made to seem as if they are three sides to the same coin.

It's just that that coin has a picture of Caesar on it. And those systems of beliefs are all used like three chains tethered to our necks, all of which demand that we "render unto Caesar what is Caesar's."  

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why Christianity is More Unnatural Than Homosexuality

I grew up in a family that is about as homophobic as Phil Robertson and the Westboro Baptists, only they're not quite as boisterous about it; at least not in public anyway. They have also conveniently convinced themselves  that their homophobia is really just their unique Christian ability to "hate the sin, but love the sinner" (even though these very same Christians adamantly refuse to accept that people can "hate Christianity, but love the Christian").  The sexual superiority complex necessarily relied on by such Christians is, of course, blanketed beneath the lambs wool of the Christian humility of serving "God." They interpret their fear of those who are different, in other words, as simply proof of their intimate knowledge and love of God. And the only thing such Christians are more sure about than that their own personal version of "God" exists, is that such a "God" would never want people to be homosexual - no matter how ma

Christianity: An Addiction of Violence Masquerading as Love: Part II

"But God by nature must love Himself supremely, above all else." Fr. Emmet Carter   This is part  two of a look at an article written about the "restorative and medicinal" properties of punishment, as espoused by Fr. Emmett Carter (https://catholicexchange.com/gods-punishment-is-just-restorative-and-medicinal/).  Ideas of this sort in Christianity go back to St. Augustine and Thomas Aquinas - two saints who saw the suffering of Christ as sure fire evidence that God needed humans to suffer to balance the cosmic scales of his love for us. Sure, he could've come up with a better game, or made better humans, but its apparently the suffering he really enjoys seeing. Carter's essay raises countless questions, especially about the true nature of God's blood lust, but lets stick to just four simpler ones. The first question deals with the idea of "free will." According to Christians, God designed us with the ability to freely choose to obey or offend h

Christianity: An Addiction of Violence Masquerading as Love: Part I

If the Holy Bible proves anything at all, it proves that the Christian God has a blood-lust like no other God in history. From Abraham to Jesus to the end times to eternal hell, the Christian God loves suffering even more than, or at least as much as, said God loves Himself. And if everything from the genocides in the Old Testament and God killing everyone on the planet with a flood, to Jesus being tortured and murdered (rather than the devil, who is the guilty one) and the fiery end of the world followed by the never ending fires of hell, are not enough to convince you that Christianity is really an addiction to violence masquerading as "love," just consider the psychotic rantings of a Catholic priest trying to convince his faithful flock that murder and mutilation - which he calls "punishment" -  are proof of just how much his "God" is pure love.  In an article published on https://catholicexchange.com/gods-punishment-is-just-restorative-and-medicinal/,